Columns

20 February 2012

Opinion: Lord Carey – Get Your Nose Out Of My Marriage

Gay-Marriage

Do you know how many times I’ve described myself as civilly partnered in the last six years? In fact do you know how many times I’ve been asked if I’m civilly partnered in that time? Or how many times friends have asked how my civil partner is rather than husband? I could probably count them on all on one hand. We are married, we are each others husbands and quite frankly what Lord Carey thinks on the issue means nothing to me.

No one gets down on bended knee and asks to be civilly partnered

Having separate legal terms for the same thing is to all intents and purposes segregation. Some may ask if I believe this, then why did I enter into a civil partnership in the first place? Well bizarrely the legal jargon didn’t really phase me, I just wanted to celebrate my love and my relationship with the man I love. It was the best we had going at the time and still is, but that does not make it completely right. There is no such thing as equal but different, it’s either equality or it’s not.

In Holland they don’t call it gay marriage, or straight marriage, it’s just marriage. When I talk to my friends straight or gay we don’t give separate names to our relationships depending on the make up of who’s in it. Are you seeing someone? Do you love someone? Are you engaged? They just got married. No straight or gay to be found there, it’s not needed because what you are talking about is love.

I could write reams and reams reminding Lord Carey his church was essentially created so the monarch of the time could do behave like a Tudor Elizabeth Taylor and rack up successive numbers of wives. Or that the great traditions of marriage are clearly defined before pointing him the direction of his own good book which lists countless variations on the subject. Perhaps I could write about how quickie divorces mean people no longer think of marriage as the great institution it once was. I could also point out that no one is forcing Lord Carey to conduct a marriage between two men either. His religion can keep on defining marriage as it likes, and making amendments to it’s apparently set in stone traditions when it sees fit.

I could say so much on this subject, most of it already said by people far cleverer than me, but the fact is love between two adults is equal. The laws surrounding it currently aren’t. This isn’t political correctness gone mad, it’s equality. It isn’t about one side winning because the battle for equality can only ever end in a draw. So Lord Carey can spout his hate, he and those against equality and can say what they like. But while they do that let’s get on with making the law reflect what already happens.

No one gets down on bended knee and asks to be civilly partnered.  When it goes wrong the people involved don’t say they’re getting a dissolution of civil partnership.

A rose by any other name may still smell as sweet, but legal rights by any other stink of segregation.



About the Author

Nick Bain
Having initially been on a quest to becoming the next Billy from Ally McBeal, after a year in Paris Nick was diverted down a more creative line. Fashion beckoned and following his graduate collection Nick moved to London where his career designing for the UK high street began. Now to be found drinking, writing, designing and sometimes running round our capital.




 
 

 
queens-speech-thro_2214564b

Out4Marriage launched to support campaign for equal marriage

So So Gay is backing Out4Marraige, the campaign to call for equal marriage in the UK, launched today.
by Benjamin Butterworth
2

 
 
paloma

So So Gay Exclusive: Paloma Faith – ‘Picking Up The Pieces’ (Bills & Hurr Remix)

So So Gay gains exclusive access to a remix of Paloma Faith's upcoming single 'Picking Up The Pieces'
by Leo Kristoffersson
2

 
 
K-Pop Girl Group, Girls' Generation

Introducing… Girl Groups: K-Pop Style

Elliot Robinson explores the veritable goldmine of untapped pop brilliance coming from a surprising corner of the planet: South Korea.
by Elliot Robinson
2

 




Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
superlative 5 pts

I've come to feel that if the Church takes issue with the state offering gay marriage, it should really be complaining about the state offering marriages at all. Marriage in the Church's sense is a religious sacrament, and so the state should have no right to offer 'civil' marriages in town halls or elsewhere. But the Church can't argue for that, it would never work.

Given that the state does offer marriages, it should do so to everyone, regardless of religious doctrine. Marriage can't be both an exclusively religious word and a broader term for a state-recognised relationship; it's one or the other, and in our society it's the latter.

Either all civil marriages should be called civil partnerships, including for straight couples, and marriage should be an exclusively religious affair with no legal basis, or all marriages conducted by the state should be called marriages.

Conversation from Twitter

bainser
bainser

dannyblahblah glad you like it