Columns

26 September 2011

Opinion: ‘Gay’ as slang – what’s in a word?

416230129_7320d64500_b

Trapped in the schoolyard: should we worry about playground slang? Featured image by ‘Hello Turkey Toe’ via Flickr.

Funny old thing, language. One minute, we’re merrily skipping about, hand in hand, singing ‘I feel pretty, oh so pretty, I feel pretty, and witty, and gay’. And the next, a schoolboy is getting reprimanded for commenting that his schoolwork is gay. That’s not very fair, is it? Remarkably, he’s not the only one. As the Daily Telegraph and other papers reported recently, thousands of children across the country - some as young as four - have been reported to school management for using the word ‘gay’ as a substitute for ‘rubbish’ or ‘naff’.

Are we really still debating this? Years after since the term ‘gay’ hit the playgrounds, it seems that now is the time to address the issue. Now, that it is so ingrained in our everyday language that I frequently hear gay people themselves using it as a slang word. Shock, horror!

Inevitably, this story has sparked a substantial amount of commentary from activists, critics and commentators. One such response is this one by Brendan O’Neill in the Telegraph, in which he simultaneously manages to insult and defend gay professionals in one paragraph. This skill with words would be admirable, if it weren’t so patronising. According to O’Neill, we should expect kids to use ‘gay’ to mean ‘crap’ because the majority of gay culture is ‘shallow and camp and kitsch. That is, crap.’ Yes, he offers a get out clause by stating that he ‘doesn’t mean culture that happens to be produced by homosexuals’. What he says he actually means is culture that is produced ‘by gay TV producers, filmmakers and magazine publishers’. The same thing, no?

O’Neill applauds children for being so perceptive as to agree with his view that gay means naff, and draws on the work of Susan Sontag who, in 1964, commented that gay culture is ‘more interested in style than content’. I’d use a paper which is more than fifty years out of date to back up my argument, too, if I thought it would help. I’ve been under the distinct impression, however, that gay culture is pretty forward thinking and current, so I no more intend to use material from twenty years before I was born than I do to wear flat shoes and no glitter on my face (I’m camp, you see).

Instead, I find it more useful to draw on peer experience. Do my LGBT friends care that gay is used negatively? Let me phrase it differently. Do my LGBT friends have the intellectual or emotional intelligence of a ten year old? No, they don’t – and, therefore, they could not give two hoots about playground slang. According to my sources, ‘sick’ now means good and ‘straight’ means boring. In your face, heteros!

Unfortunately, there are some things in this life which we just cannot control. Language is one of them. Slang words spread through playgrounds like a rebellious tsunami, hell bent on aggravating linguists and generally portraying the ‘I’m so cool that I don’t need to use words which make sense’ image.  If you’re determined to turn things around you could try reclaiming the word, as with SlutWalks. GayWalks, anyone? Or alternatively, we could do what we’re doing already: rise above it.



About the Author

Claire Connor
Claire writes features and begrudgingly takes out the "I think"s. She is a self-affirmed feminist who some may label as emotionally unavailable but she prefers the term ‘intriguingly enigmatic’. If society wasn't so incessantly closed-minded Claire would go to work in pyjamas and only ever eat edamame beans.




 
 

 
PENALTY shutterstock_62661346

Exclusive: PENALTY – by Annika Sturm – Instalment # 3

Annika Sturm gives us an exclusive look at her latest offering, Penalty, exploring the slightly sordid lives of two very friendly footballers.
by Guest Writer
0

 
 
PENALTY shutterstock_62661346

Exclusive: PENALTY – by Annika Sturm – Instalment #2

Annika Sturm gives us an exclusive look at her latest offering, Penalty, exploring the slightly sordid lives of two very friendly footballers.
by Guest Writer
0

 
 
shutterstock_62661346

Exclusive: PENALTY – by Annika Sturm – Instalment #1

Annika Sturm gives us an exclusive look at her latest offering, Penalty, exploring the slightly sordid lives of two very friendly footballers.
by Gerard Daniels
0

 




Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

I completely disagree with you, we do have control over language. We should all consider and take responsibility for the words we use and the words we teach children. Saying gay instead of crap may not seem like a big deal tnow but the fact gay now has this third, negative connotation obviously stems from past homophobia. To normalise it's use in this way is to normalise the idea that gay people are lesser, a bit rubbish, ok but not really normal.

Reclaiming words also shows a lack of responsibility for our language. Women calling themselves sluts and black rappers calling each other n***a have taken words imbued with hundreds of years of negative meaning and said, yes that is an appropriate signifier for me. Yes, this word comes from prejudice against me and in my struggle against this prejudice I will use the exact words my oppressor uses against me. It doesn't mean you have taken it back for yourself, it means you have given in and accepted the awful thing you were called to keep you down.

Okay, fine.  So the use of 'gay' as a derogatory slang doesn't hurt the feelings of you and your LGBT friends.  That's all well and good.

But what about the emotional well-being of those that *do* have the intellectual and emotional capacity of a ten year old?  You know, because they're ten.  I don't think the justification behind punishing school-yard uses of the word has to do with whether it hurts the feelings of adults.  It has to do with the children subjected to that environment on a five-day-a-week basis.

The problem with it, in my opinion, stems largely from the fact of adolescents starting to question their sexual identity are doing while having the equation of gay=garbage crammed down their throats.  And sure, we can say 'it's just kids being kids', 'they don't really mean it like that', but that doesn't remove or invalidate the association that's going to occur.  And, at the very least, having there be school-yard punishment for such uses of the word proves that there are people, somewhere, that disagree with such a sentiment.

So, while 'rise above it' might be a viable strategy for those of us old enough to do so, let's not forget that rules about what's said on the playground really aren't aimed at us.

I just think its a shame that one can identify with ones sexuality by considering ones self "being gay" only to find out that it also mean "thats rubbish". 

It's incredibly irritating that the term gay to mean rubbish has been allowed to spread into common culture and is in a way a thinly veiled institutionalised homophobic insult forever embedded in the social psyche. 

Whilst its something that as adults one can put aside, why should we have to? I don't think we can re-claim the word gay, but what other options are there, I'm a homo just doesn't have the same ring to it....

Oh Claire, to have achieved such maturity that you can rise above the school ground taunts. I praise your measured level headedness. Language is indeed a beautiful and fluid thing. It is a creature that can never be tamed. But there is a massive distance between language and it's use.

Perhaps I am stuck in some warped land where I do have the emotional and intellectual intelligence of a ten year old, but when someone uses gay to mean shit it does still hurt. When it comes to equality my own personal acid test is replace the word with that representing another minority, women, jew, black. Is it offensive using this new word? Then yes it is offensive. It's a child like simplicity but maybe that's why it works. Would you stop a child (and I'm only using a child as an example here as your piece focuses on the playground) using black, muslim, disabled as a pejorative term? I should hope so, or would you tell the minorities in question to just rise above it.

I am thankfully no longer a child, but that doesn't mean I have yet to escape the use of the word gay in a negative and homophobic way. Something tells me the two lads hollering 'gayer' and 'batty boy' weren't doing so merely as a way to get my attention when asking for directions. Though to be fair I was in short shorts and absent mindedly shimming to Kylie on my iPhone so to be fair they weren't using Sherlock like powers of deduction to assertain my sexuality.

The tricky point we come to really is the meaning intended by the user. I've often described things as being gay. It's normally a statement of fact. As a bloke going down on another is pretty gay no matter how straight the marine in question may claim to be. My mates my call me a potato munching paddy, but this comes from a place of love and jovial banter. A child in school struggling to come to terms with their own sexuality and hearing everything that is bad and wrong is gay will believe the same about themselves. Unlike you and your mates Claire, they probably dont have the benefit of hindsight (what with being in the situation right there and then) and realise its just something to get over. To them gay is shit, and therefore they are shit.

I see where you're coming from Claire, I really do. Reclaiming words doesn't really work. Try asking a group of LGBT grown ups what words they find acceptable and what words they still find offensive. You'll get a flurry of different responses. I certainly wouldn't condone banning words outright either, such kind of censorship only gives the negative connotations more power. But how's this for an interesting tack, simple explanations as to why using certain words as negative helps no one. Let's not single out the LGBT community here either. I once saw a very powerful piece of film where a black teenager was challenged on his use of 'nigger' by a very talented black poet. She explained exactly what that word meant and where it came from. The teenager and subsequently his friends stopped using the word.

Nor am I advocating being a killjoy and killing humour, the ability to laugh at ourselves and with allies is not just hilarious, but empowering. Like I say it's all about the way in which language is used, not the word itself. Education and humour from a positive direction, will more than likely see the use of the word 'gay' as negative change much faster than merely rising above it. Not only that but it doesn't leave anyone behind to think that gay equals shit and therefore shit equals them. I'll admit it takes more work, and a thicker skin but isn't it better than the alternative?

I 100% agree with you Nick.

As adults it's our role to educate child what is wrong and right. The word 'gay' being used as a deogitory term has been over looked for years by teachers, afraid to intervene, and now has become part of everyday speech for many youngesters, who are now teenagers and due to be adults.

Yes, many will grow out of using it, like we did with words like rad, rufus and kowabunga. However for a child confused about their sexuality, everytime they hear that word used by peers its a kick in the teeth for their self-esteem.

Whilst we stil have hate crimes on our streets, children commiting suicide due to bullying in schools I think we, as a gay community, all need to think carefully about what we light heartedly accept and class as 'okay language' for the wider community to use.

I take it all too seriously too Peter! 

I understand what Clare mean's but as an adult, once having found ones feet and place in society it's very easy to rise above with a sticks and stones attitude. In a classroom environment there should be an enforcement against words that reinforce stereotype, hateful attitudes or prejudice - whether it be on sexuality, race, religion or anything else. Also, Sontag's 'On Camp' may seem dated, and I'm in no way trying to agree with O'niell, but this work shouldn't be dismissed. It's huge importance for me lies in the fact that Sontag separates the idea Camp and gay culture. So in essence we can use Camp to analyse something, that may be heavily rooted in gay culture but actually it's the Camp element (the exaggeration or artifice) that we like or dislike. Rather than liking/disliking the fact that it's rooted in gay culture - which could be viewed as homophobic. 

I also love the irony of 'gay' replacing 'naff' meaning someone was straight or "Not Available For Fucking". However, people were using Naff without knowing it had an origin outside of 'rubbish'. But people's use of gay has always been accompanied with a half hearted apology knowing they shouldn't say it, but not caring enough to stop saying it.  Maybe I should not get so wound up by it and stop correcting adults. But kids, I'm afraid I'll always correct and explain to them why I hate hearing gay used as a synonym for crap. 

I can completely see where Claire is coming from.  But it's one of those things that jabs like a knife everytime I hear, "that's SO gay!"  There's no point in reclaiming a word I suppose, as the sheer nature of language doesn't have time for retrograde steps.  I can't help but feel as though saying "this is gay" is translated to me as though I am perceived as useless and rubbish because of my orientation.  I probably am taking it all to seriously, but it still winds me up. 

I guess its time to just give up on correcting people on it. *sigh*